Pages

Showing posts with label Thisday. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Thisday. Show all posts

Friday, 2 December 2016

Nigerian Naira faces further pressure against US dollar

The naira is seen weakening further against the United States dollar next week amid a crackdown in the parallel market currency traders and the persistent scarcity of the greenback.
Reuters of NBC  reported that foreign exchange demand by small businesses was set to surge ahead of holiday season sales. The local currency fell 2.08 per cent week-on-week on Thursday to 480 to the dollar on the parallel market against 470 a dollar last week, while it was quoted by commercial lenders at 314.80 a dollar on the interbank market.
The naira has, however, consistently closed around 305.5 a dollar level since August via the official window. “The consistent clampdown on black market operators by security agents has driven some currency retailers underground, putting more pressure on available hard currency,” one dealer said. But the Kenyan shilling could strengthen against the dollar in the coming week due to subdued importer demand and increased inflows from overseas remittances, traders said. At 0742 GMT, commercial banks quoted the shilling at 101.80/102.00 to the dollar, the same as last Thursday’s close.
“From the data we’ve seen in the past, we normally tend to see an uptick in the Diaspora inflows during this month of December,” said a trader at a commercial bank. Ghana’s cedi is expected to regroup in coming weeks on improved forex inflows as the central bank launches a $40m fortnightly interbank auction, traders say. The cedi has been fairly stable this year but began sliding last month on a seasonal surge in end-of-year import demand and election-year shocks. It was trading at 4.3000 to the dollar at 1020 GMT on Thursday, compared with 4.1000 a week ago.
“We see the local unit potentially taking back some gains should the regulator keep the amount offered at $40m in the upcoming fortnightly auctions,” a Barclays Bank Ghana analyst, Andrews Akoto, said.
 Copyright PUNCH.
All rights reserved. This material, and other digital content on this website, may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in whole or in part without prior express written permission from Naijabroadcast
Contact editor @ nsiscoxpress




The naira has, however, consistently closed around 305.5 a dollar level since August via the official window.

Monday, 21 November 2016

How Pope Francis extends permission on abortion forgiveness to priests


 Reports had it that Pope Francis is allowing all priests to absolve the faithful of the “grave sin” of abortion, extending indefinitely the special permission he had granted for the duration of the just-ended Holy Year of Mercy.
Francis wrote in the Apostolic Letter made public by the Vatican on Monday that “there is no sin that God’s mercy cannot reach and wipe away when it finds a repentant heart seeking to be reconciled” with God.
But he also wrote: “I wish to restate as firmly as I can that abortion is a grave sin, since it puts an end to an innocent life.”
Because the Roman Catholic Church holds abortion to be such a serious sin, it was long a matter for a bishop who could either hear the woman’s confession himself or delegate that to a priest who was expert in such situations.
Church law says that when a woman has an abortion she and all those who aided her, including doctors, nurses and spouses, are automatically excommunicated from the Catholic Church.
If a woman (or an accomplice) confesses the abortion, an ordinary priest had not been allowed to grant absolution, but had to ask the local bishop for special permission. 
But in 2015, Francis allowed all rank-and-file priests for the duration of the Holy Year to grant absolution for an abortion. The Holy Year, which began on Dec. 8, 2015, ended on Sunday, Nov. 20, 2016, the day he signed the letter.
By permitting all priests to absolve the sin of abortion, Francis was further applying his vision of a merciful church. Last year, he wrote that some women who had abortions felt they had no choice but to make “this agonizing and painful decision.”
“May every priest, therefore, be a guide, support and comfort to penitents on this journey of special reconciliation” after abortion, Francis said in his latest letter.
A top Holy See official, Monsignor Rino Fisichella, told a news conference at the Vatican on Monday that the pope’s words applied also to those who were involved in an abortion.
“The sin of abortion is technically an expression that includes all the people who are involved in an abortion,” Fisichella said in response to a question from The Associated Press. “Thus from the women to the nurse to the doctor and whoever supports this procedure.”
Fisichella added: “The sin of abortion is inclusive. Thus forgiveness for the sin of abortion is all-inclusive and extends to all those who are participants in this sin.”
In his Apostolic Letter, Francis explained his rationale: “Lest any obstacle arise between the request for reconciliation and God’s forgiveness, I henceforth grant to all priests, in virtue of their ministry, the faculty to absolve those who have committed the sin of procured abortion.”
During the recent U.S. presidential election campaign, some Catholic pastors urged their congregations to keep in mind the “sacredness in life” - seen as a reference to abortion - when deciding which candidate would get their vote. U.S. President-elect Donald Trump voiced his opposition to abortion while campaigning, while his Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton, supported women’s right to have an abortion.
However, the current pope has taken a more progressive approach to church doctrine. At the time Pope Francis initially opened up abortion to priests last year, theologian Fr. Robert Dodaro, president of the Patristic Institute Augustinianum in Rome, said the move was in line with the pope’s larger beliefs.
“Pope Francis is showing enormous compassion for people in difficult situations. He has always been very strong on the sacrament of penance, and... he continues to develop what has been a strong theme in his papacy, which is that God is always ready to forgive, and we should not place obstacles in the way,” Dodaro said.
Four cardinals, including archconservative U.S. Cardinal Raymond Burke, recently criticized Francis for what they indicated was ambiguity in past statements on whether divorced Catholics who remarry can receive Communion. Burke and the others expressed fear that Francis was causing “confusion” by saying the matter could be left to the discernment of local priests. Church teaching holds such Catholics are adulterers living in sin, and thus shouldn’t receive Communion.
In the letter on abortion, Francis made plain that there can be no ambiguity in laying out moral principles, even while stressing the church’s merciful side.
Addressing priests in part of the 10-page letter, Francis said: “I ask you to be welcoming to all, witnesses of fatherly love whatever the gravity of the sin involved, attentive in helping penitents to reflect on the evil they have done, clear in presenting moral principles, willing to walk patiently beside the faithful on their penitential journey, farsighted in discerning individual cases and generous in dispensing God’s forgiveness.”
“Mercy cannot become a mere parenthesis in the life of the church; it constitutes her very existence,” Francis wrote.
While the pope’s approach to forgiveness for abortion could distress those Catholics holding a more rigid application of church teaching, he reached out to traditionalists too in his letter.
He declared that faithful attending churches officiated by priests of the Fraternity of St. Pius X, an ultra-conservative breakaway group, can “validly and licitly receive the sacramental absolution of their sins.” Francis had previously limited that permission only for the period of the Holy Year.
Francis also expressed hope that these breakaway priests are striving to work for full Communion with the Roman Catholic Church.
Edited by NBC support

Tuesday, 15 November 2016

FG Draw in an immediate deploitation of contractors in Abuja, Enugu, PH, Lagos airports

minister of state for Aviation Hadi Sirika 



According to Reports, The Federal Government of Nigeria has deployed contractors in the Abuja, Enugu, Port Harcourt and Lagos airports to fix some of the infrastructural problems at the facilities. Some of the infrastructural issues being fixed, according to the Minister of State for Aviation, Senator Hadi Sirika, include the dilapidated runways, terminal buildings as well as taxiways. Sirika, who spoke in Abuja on Monday, stated that funds were now available for the repair of the bad portions of the runway at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport in the Federal Capital Territory, adding that the facility would be fixed as quickly as possible.
He said, “Contractors are back on site in Port Harcourt to finish the terminal building, especially the arrival side. Also, our contractors are back on the Enugu runway and the central taxiway in Lagos. “Significant too is that the Abuja runway is being attended to. The contractor will be mobilised to site shortly within this week or next.” The minister further stated that a few years ago, Nigeria embarked on a turnkey project for the provision of a new aeronautical telecommunication network to automate its aeronautical information management system.
The project was to develop a communication backbone with a network of 26 VSATs at all the airports, and at the headquarters of the Nigerian Airspace Management Agency and the Nigerian Emergency Management Agency for search and rescue coordination. Sirika stated that the project had delivered a central aeronautical database that was currently being populated with data that would enhance seamless integration with other states or regional databases. According to him, the project is scheduled for completion in 11 locations by next month, while the remaining 15 locations will be completed in 2017. “Similarly, approval has been granted for the software and hardware upgrade and maintenance of the current total radar coverage of Nigeria to make the system more efficient and inter-operational with other systems,” the minister added.
Copyright   N.B.C.
All rights reserved. This material, and other digital content on this website, may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in whole or in part without prior express written permission from  NAIJABROADCAST
click to contact editor: NSISCOXPRESS

The Biggest Pamita Snake At BIASE

       The Nigerian Broadcasting corporation reported recently that  one of the dangerious animal that suddenly got so infuriated with children of the same peer has serve as a protective major for the people of "BIASE". According to the interview held, the big snake has become an object of defense  to the people of BIASE, its  displays some sign  of notification owing to what is going to happen next in the village. Many believe its their Gods of the Land. 
Festival Suits
Naijabroadcast has also being able to verify that the so called pamita snake is always celebrated during festive period and also different kinds of placement  have been carried appropriately in other to fulfilled their  their norms and cultural vibes.
The deep forest of Afiko Damila were pamita snake lives is always visited once in a year and that alone is done by kings men of the land therefore whatever notification will be discuss to the native dwellers of the land.

A Suspicious Reports of stripping Wizkid of his MTV EMA award.


A review reports  came as a rude shock to Nigerians when it was announced that ace artiste, Ayo ‘Wizkid’ Balogun was “incorrectly” awarded the Best African Act award at the recently concluded MTV European Music Awards held in Rotterdam, Netherlands, on November 6, 2016. The award which was initially given to Wizkid was said to have been taken from him and given to his Tanzanian counterpart, Alikiba.
It was reported that the MTV EMA posted a statement on its website which named Alikiba, as the rightful recipient of the award. The statement read, “MTV congratulates Alikiba, who has won Best African Act at the 2016 MTV EMAs. The news was revealed 10 November, after the incorrect results were posted late Sunday night (6 November) due to an error. Six Worldwide Act winners, including Wizkid, were selected by an international committee of MTV music executives to recognise current artists who are rising to have a wider geographic appeal beyond their local regions. The winners were chosen based on a range of criteria including international MTV video play, radio airplay, streams, and sales across multiple territories and regions. 
The winner of Best African Act was selected by fans via votes on MTVEMA.com. Both Wizkid and Alikiba are great artistes and deserving winners at the MTV EMAs and we congratulate them wholeheartedly on their achievements. We apologise for any confusion but we are pleased to recognise the achievements of both artists on this global platform.” Efforts made by Saturday Beats to confirm the development on the website did not yield any result.
Reacting to this development, Wizkid’s manager, Sunday Are, told Saturday Beats via a telephone conversation that there was something fishy going on. “They had announced him as the winner and if he was at the award ceremony and the award had been given to him in person, would they come back to say that the award isn’t for him anymore? I think there is something fishy going on about this development. If Wizkid was present to receive the award, would they have said on stage that it was an error? I really think there is something suspicious going on. The MTV EMA is not a small award, it is a very prestigious one and they cannot afford to make such a mistake because it is too costly. Personally, I think there is more to this and something suspicious is going on,” he said.
Copyright  NAIJABROADCAST.                
All rights reserved. This material, and other digital content on this website, may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in whole or in part without prior express written permission from NaijaBroadcast
Contact Editor:  N.B.A

A Glass of Beer Every Day Could Keep Health Practitionist Away













Drinking one serving, or a pint, of beer each day could reduce the risk of stroke or heart disease by enhancing levels of "good" cholesterol.

Shue Huang, a Ph.D. candidate at Penn State University in Pennsylvania, studied 80,000 healthy Chinese adults and their normal drinking habits for six years. Those who consistently drank moderately were found to have a slower decline in levels of good cholesterol, or high-density lipoprotein (HDL). For men, this amounted to one or two servings of alcohol daily. For women, moderate consumption is defined as a lesser half to one serving per day. The study found that when compared to heavy drinking or no drinking at all, minimal daily alcohol consumption slowed the decline of good cholesterol, thereby shrinking a person’s risk of stroke or heart disease.
The study also surveyed the consumption of hard liquor and found that only light drinkers saw slower rates of HDL decline. Light drinking for men is defined as less than one serving per day. For women, it is zero to 0.4 servings per day. The study didn’t include enough wine drinkers to adequately conclude the effects of moderate wine consumption.
Because the study surveyed only Chinese adults, it’s unclear whether or not the results can be attributed to a broader population. However, the results are in keeping with the government’s suggestions for alcohol consumption. Federal dietary guidelines suggest limiting servings to one drink per day for women and up to two drinks per day for men.
Heart disease and stroke are major problems in the United States and throughout the world. Cardiovascular disease ranks as the number one killeraround the globe and accounts for 17.3 million deaths every day. That number is expected to rise to 23.6 million by 2030.
This is not the first time that researchers have touted the benefits of alcohol. In 2000, a Harvard School of Public Health study showed that moderate amounts of alcohol can cut heart-disease risk.

Major Habits That Destroy Trust in Human Relationship


Trust is built as people begin see the other person's side of the story, and give-and-take is necessary for a romantic relationship to work. 'This demonstrates a preference placed on his own needs rather than yours,' says Jane Greer, PhD, New York-based relationship expert, and author of How Could You Do This to Me? Learning to Trust After Betrayal. 'If that's the case, how can you trust him to be emotionally supportive when you need him?' For a relationship to be successful, you need to learn how to make the other person happy, too. 'Someone who never compromises is selfish and immature,' says April Masini, a New York-based relationship and etiquette expert and author. 'Anyone in a healthy relationship knows that 'you win some, you lose some' is not just a sing-song phrase; it's truth. If someone won't compromise, it means he cares more about having his way than giving in and being generous.' 

The Disillusionment of Edward Snowden



upon depicting dissidents or political troublemakers, Hollywood usually calls on one of two character types. The first is the moral visionary, the Joan of Arc or Martin Luther King Jr., who spends their life in the service of a beautiful future, trying to teach others to see it along with them. The visionaries are heroic because they are not like us, because they are saints. The second type is the everyman: the plainspoken, not-more-than-moderately ambitious fellow who sticks up for what’s right because that’s what anyone with a little common sense and decency would do. The everyman is heroic because he is like us—and does something great anyway. Hollywood has sometimes portrayed actual historical figures as both types. Spielberg’s Lincoln is a saint; John Ford’s is an everyman. Although the real Ed Snowden is an international fugitive defined by his arcane knowledge of some of the world’s most secret technologies, Oliver Stone’s Snowden, as played by Joseph Gordon Levitt in Snowden, turns out to be one of us.

He is like us in the film’s opening at Ft. Benning, where he enters basic training in the hopes of serving in the Army’s Special Forces. That training requires lots of running and wall-climbing, plus being screamed at from the break of dawn until lights-out. You and I wouldn’t make it, and neither did Snowden, who breaks his leg getting out of bed one morning and is quickly discharged, which is a huge disappointment. He joins the CIA, hoping to help his country do something about terrorism, and he is like us when he is flattered that an instructor recognizes him as talented and begins to take an interest in the young man’s career. He is like us when his relationship with Lindsay Mills has ups and downs, when he sometimes gets jealous, and when he has sex with her in the usual positions. Establishing Snowden’s relatability takes up chunks of the film’s running time that could be spent on some of the more exciting parts of Snowden’s life, like how he finagled a flight to Russia while stranded in Hong Kong. That adventure is compressed to within an inch of its life in a montage.
Of course, what happens to the everyman in many Oliver Stone films (PlatoonBorn on the Fourth of JulyWorld Trade Center) is that he gets disillusioned. Experience undermines the myths around which the hero has organized his—and it’s almost always “his”; Stone has directed just one film with a female protagonist—worldview. Cast out of moral infancy, he loses his bearings and strains his personal relationships to the breaking point. Ultimately, he decides to change his life in accordance with what has been learned. Stone has told the story of a man’s painful awakening from ignorance over and over again.
Beyond “ Edwared Snowden”’s clumsiness as a film, lies a bigger problem: Oliver Stone’s own arc of disillusionment.
In Snowden, it’s Mills (Shailene Woodley) who first begins to chip away at her boyfriend’s political complacency. Their first-date stroll just happens to take them through an Iraq War protest, which Snowden dismisses as people “lashing out” against the men and women who are trying to keep the country safe. “I’m not lashing out,” Mills, who sympathizes with the protesters, replies. “I’m questioning our government. That’s the principle this country is founded on.” That civics lesson doesn’t transform Snowden’s politics, even if he does admire Lindsay’s feistiness, but he, still new to the CIA, soon encounters the dark side of intelligence gathering in Geneva. Snowden wants to get out from behind a computer screen and onto the front lines of spy craft, and to that end he is asked to befriend a Pakistani businessman, get him drunk in a strip club, and then put him behind the wheel of a car. Snowden balks: Endangering an innocent man’s life for the sake of some tiny intelligence victory is immoral. He doesn’t know the half of it.
Despite Hollywood’s reputation as a depraved bastion of haughty liberalism, the country’s film industry produces jingoistic nightmares like American Sniper much more frequently than works that criticize the government’s conduct in a substantive way. Snowden’s best scene takes place at a Hawaii house party where Snowden’s coworkers, sitting around a lovely fire pit, cautiously acknowledge the immorality of the drone warfare they’re conducting and then bat away the implications of what they’re saying with weak rhetoric about just doing a job. Snowden steps in, noting that after the Nuremberg trials finished dealing with the Holocaust’s architects, prosecutors turned their attention to the rank and file, people who just carried out orders they had no role in formulating. “I’m just saying,” Snowden says. Credit where credit is due: That is not the kind of thing that often appears in a Hollywood film.
Despite all this, I found Snowden to be largely boring and unedifying. The people running the government’s surveillance programs are little more than caricatures, wearing black suits and rehashing tired conspiracy-thriller lines about how Americans want security more than freedom. The depiction of Snowden’s escape from Hong Kong is oddly brief, while newspaper editors argue at some length about when, exactly, they should publish Glenn Greenwald’s first story. The ins and outs of metadata collection and digital surveillance are illustrated via meaninglessly dazzling CGI collages. Stone has always been a bit of a brute-force filmmaker, but in Snowden the force of his subject matter does more to carry the audience’s interest than the means by which he brings it to the screen.
Beyond the film’s clumsiness on the levels of technique and screenwriting, however, lies a bigger problem: Stone’s own arc of disillusionment. Raised by conservative, wealthy parents in New York City, Stone supported Goldwater as a teenager in 1964. Then he insisted on combat duty when he signed up to fight in Vietnam, hoping to prove his masculinity to his father. What he actually found overseas, he told an interviewer, was that war “completely deadened me and sickened me.” On his return to the States, the good son of a Republican stockbroker was “drifting around for a period of time, doing a lot of drugs, a lot of acid, and really kind of at a loss in my life.” Film school at NYU, under the supervision of Martin Scorsese, saved Stone, and it’s clear from the films he would go on to make that both his politics and the way he thinks about the politics of others were decisively shaped by the war and its fallout. With its military uselessness, its persistence long after that uselessness was plain to millions, and the thousands of traumatized veterans it spat back onto the streets of American town and cities, the Vietnam War was an experience of disillusionment for the culture as a whole. It rebuked the patriotic bromides that had saturated public discourse ever since the American triumph in World War II, and it called into question the entire rationale of the fight against Communism. That experience of mass sobering was a crucial one, and Stone has done a real service in documenting its 20th-century manifestations.
However, the problem with politics today is not that people are insufficiently disillusioned. Two-thirds of Americans believe the country is headed in the wrong direction; both candidates in this year’s presidential election were historically unpopular; a majority of young people say they disapprove of capitalism—the list goes on. The forces currently paralyzing political progress lie elsewhere, and in Snowden, Stone misses them. Snowden’s passage from patriotic, techno-libertarian oddball to crusading anti-surveillance activist is the least interesting thing about him. Snowden’s real achievement is that he found a way to make the government pay attention to a citizen who thought there was something wrong with how the “War on Terror” is being carried out. Working inside a government that provides its citizens with no avenue for meaningfully registering disapproval of the “War on Terror,” Snowden decided to make an avenue of his own and then face the consequences of that decision.
As future dissidents look for new ways of making the government finally pay attention to those it represents, they will look to Edward Snowden (and his predecessor, Chelsea Manning) for inspiration and assistance. They just won’t be looking to the version of Edward Snowden who appears in Oliver Stone’s film. When Gordon Levitt as Snowden finally makes it out of his NSA workplace with the pilfered files in hand, he smiles beatifically in slow motion. Then Stone films Snowden from behind; the hero slowly disappears into a blur of sunlight, as though the whistle-blower were being whisked straight up to Paradise. Despite an epilogue in which the real Edward Snowden appears on camera and delivers a TED Talk, the implication of that culminating scene is that Snowden’s work is done. That’s what’s frustrating about Snowden: Even today, the work Snowden took up is just beginning.
Thisday Report from # N. B. C

Reasons Why your bank account may be frozen In Nigeria

Report held that, the key reasons why  your bank account is frozen, you cannot use your money, outstanding cheques will not clear, and you may be responsible for bank charges as a result. When creditors freeze your account, it is also called a bank levy, attachment, or garnishment.
A frozen bank account is an account that has been suspended and cannot be used to withdraw money, pay cheques, make transfers, or fund your bill pay services.
  • Why is an account frozen?: Generally, an account is frozen because you owe someone money. Your account can be frozen if you have unpaid judgment against you, or if you owe taxes.
  • How are creditors able to freeze my account?: Most creditors will need to get a judgment against you before they are able to freeze your bank account. Once they have a judgment against you, if you have not taken steps to pay the judgment or agreed to a payment schedule for satisfying the judgment, the judgment creditor can request that the court issue an order that directs the bank to freeze your account. These orders are often called garnishments or attachments.
  • Is the entire account frozen or just part?: In most cases, the bank can freeze up to two times the amount that is set out in the garnishment or attachment order. If this exceeds the amount in your account, your entire account will be frozen. If it does not, it will only be partially frozen.
  • Can I continue to make deposits?: You can probably make deposits into the account, but you stand the risk that the new deposits are frozen as well. If the amount in the account at the time it was frozen was less than two times the amount set out in the garnishment or attachment order, the new deposits will likely be frozen.
  • Will I receive advance notice?: It is unlikely that you will receive any advance notice. The bank is required to notify you when it receives the attachment but the account will be frozen by the time you receive the notice.
  • Challenging the attachment: The notice that you receive should set out your rights to object to the attachment and may identify exemptions, which will allow the funds to be released to you. The notice should provide the deadlines for you to object or challenge the attachment and identify the creditor and the case in which the attachment has been issued. In most cases, to challenge the attachment, you will need to file papers with the court telling the judge why you don’t believe the attachment is appropriate.
  • Getting your money back: If you owe the money that the creditor is trying to collect through the attachment, your options are limited. You can contact the creditor or the creditor’s lawyer to see if they will release the attachment. If they won’t, you need to take further action.
Dealing with a court order on your account
if your creditor has taken court action against you for a debt, they may have got a court order against you. A court order means you have to pay the money back, either in instalments or in full by a certain date, according to www.citizensadvice.org.uk.
If you don’t keep to the terms of a court order, your creditor has a number of different options to try and get their money back.
If your creditor thinks that you have the money to pay them and are holding it back, or are due to be paid some money, which will cover the debt, they can apply for another court order. This is called a third party debt order. A third party debt order allows your creditor to take the money you owe them directly from whoever has the money.
Usually, it is your bank that is holding your money for you. However, if you are due to get a lump sum such as a redundancy settlement, an inheritance or insurance policy pay-out, your creditor can get your employer, solicitor or insurance company to pay the money to them instead of you. They can only take enough money to clear the debt.
The kinds of debts that may end up with your creditor trying to get a third party debt order include money owed on personal loans, credit cards, overdrafts or hire purchase agreements.
A third party debt order is different from an attachment of earnings order, where your creditor gets a court order to take money from your wages.
If your creditor wants to get a third party debt order, they will first apply for a temporary order called an interim third party debt order. This order tells your bank to freeze your account. At this point, your account will be frozen but no money will be paid to your creditor until the judge has decided what to do at the final hearing.
#All Right Reserve at N.B.C

Monday, 14 November 2016

How Soyinka’s generation of intellectuals Achivement misled Africa



 A report from an evening broadcast held that Wole Soyinka had vowed to cut up his Green Card if Donald Trump won the presidential election in America, I did not know what to think.
I suspect that Soyinka intended his declaration to be a symbolic act of revolutionary significance; an act which, though seemingly self-defeatist, would be a rallying cry for a political and intellectual fight back against right wing extremism, much like the self-immolation of the Tunisian street vendor served as a rallying cry for the Arab Spring.
But why, I asked myself, did I feel unsettled about Soyinka’s intended dramatic and emotive action? Why did I not feel encouraged or inspired by his declaration? Why did the declaration instead evoke a sense of impotence? Why did I feel that it was pitiable rather than defiant? Why was there a feeling similar to the one elicited by Lawino (main protagonist in Okot P’Bitek’s poem) when she offers archaic superstitious customs as proof of superiority of her culture?
Then it all dawned on me. Soyinka’s declaration really symbolised the futile end to which the nationalist ideological project had come. Began roughly after the Second World War, this project sought to “decolonise the mind” by validating the once denigrated African traditional worldview. Even more crucially, it sought to incorporate traditional beliefs and values in an overarching ideology of change that would guide an African political and cultural renaissance.
To this project, African intellectuals, including writers of the ‘Makerere’ generation, would commit themselves. That is why the central theme of most intellectual and artistic expression over the last 50 years is the attempt to validate the traditional worldview, and to define an ideology that would guide Africa’s future progress.
DELIBERATE INSTITUTIONALISATION
In works of fiction, this theme is promoted by juxtaposing assumed self-evident morality of the traditional society with moral decadence of Western culture. In Song of Lawino, for instance, the character of Ocol and his world are depicted as shallow, fake, ugly, self-loathing and immoral. By contrast, Lawino and her world are presented as authentic, beautiful and moral. The poem is implicit from which world, Ocol’s or Lawino’s, we should draw the cultural materials with which to construct a new African ideology of change.
For his part, Kwame Nkrumah in his book, Consciencism, defines this ideology as an amalgamation of African humanist and egalitarian principles, and socialism. The book offers no proof of the existence of these ideals in traditional African society. Nkrumah assumed that they occurred naturally in traditional society. And, of course, as many Ghanaians who suffered torture and imprisonment under Nkrumah would confirm, these ideals were absent in his rapacious and ruthless dictatorship.
As Nkrumah’s rule showed, the idea of “African democracy” that African intellectuals were trying to formulate had serious conceptual flaws. The intellectuals, just like Nkrumah, assumed that traditional societies were democratic and egalitarian by nature, and that, in these societies, everyone, including women and children, were treated equally.
They further assumed that because these democratic values existed naturally in Africa, they did not need any deliberate institutionalisation in the body politic of the newly independent nations.
The flaw in this thinking was twofold. First, as Edward Simiyu and others have established, pre-colonial societies were far from democratic. Second, even supposing they were, there was still need for a deliberate effort to institutionalise those traditional democratic values in the systems of the emerging nations.
The intellectuals had assigned themselves a curious task. They sought to formulate an ideology to guide the future progress of Africa by looking back. By contrast, the French revolutionaries who proposed the ideas of ‘liberty, equality and brotherhood’ looked to recreate new French society on the basis of new ideas of democracy and equality. 
And that is how African intellectual discourse missed the opportunity to influence democratic change on the continent. This task was left to civil society organisations and the church, which in the mid and late eighties began to agitate, not for restitution of a mythical African democracy, but for a new African society based on modern democratic ideas.
The contrasting visions of civil society and the intellectuals would be captured most graphically by two events in 2000. As civil society, the church and ordinary citizens were discussing the pros and cons of different constitutional and democratic models at national conventions, African intellectuals and writers gathered under a tree in Asmara in Eriteria and declared, in the misguided spirit of Walter Rodney, that “colonial and neo-colonial forces and their local allies” had underdeveloped African economies. And, not to forget their intellectual mission over the years, they declared that “decolonisation of the African mind should go hand in hand with decolonization of the economy and politics”.
ABSURD GESTURE
These declarations were emotive and simplistic, for they did not offer practical social programmes, economic and political proposals on how to achieve decolonisation of the mind, politics and economy.
More telling of the total disconnect of the intellectuals from practical reality, they sat under a tree to symbolise democracy in pre-colonial Africa, yet failed to denounce the vicious dictatorship in Eriteria. The act of sitting under a tree, just like their simple slogans, and Soyinka’s later Green Card threat, really emphasised the comical and tragic incongruity of their situation.
What were the costs of the missed opportunity to recreate new societies based on modern ideas of democracy and justice? What were the costs of governance experiments inspired by ideas of recreating new societies from old values? The answer is seen in the economic catastrophe in Africa and the years of political repression. It is seen in the litany of failed or failing states.
It is seen in recurring violence and continuing degradation of women through stone-age practices such as FGM. It is seen in the thousands of Africans risking death in the seas to escape the hopelessness in their countries. It is seen in the ‘cult of the Green Card,’ which I define as a maniacal ambition to live in America or Europe.
And so when I heard of Soyinka’s intended gesture, it was not defiance or triumph that I sensed. It was defeat. Here was a man who had dedicated his intellectual life to reclamation of an ‘African metaphysics’ now threatening to lash out with his Green Card. Nothing can be more absurd than a vision of Soyinka hurling shreds of his Green Card to the four winds and proclaiming victory.
It is a sad and futile act, symbolising the final defeat of Soyinka’s and his generation of intellectuals’ search for Eldorado, the mythical city of gold.

Resignation of DR Congo prime minister



 Prime Minister Augustin Matata Ponyo from  Congo resigned Monday to make way for an opposition figure to take his place following talks aimed at averting a political crisis.
"I have offered my resignation as well as those of the members of my government... to respond to the spirit and the letter of the accord," said Matata as he left a meeting with President Joseph Kabila, referring to the deal struck after a political dialogue boycotted by the main opposition parties.
DRC's political crisis deepened last month after a presidential election, which had been due before the year's end, was postponed until April 2018.
The opposition has accused Kabila, who has been in office since 2001, of manipulating the electoral system to stay in power after his second term ends on December 20.
The decision to delay the vote was taken in October by the government and fringe opposition groups following a "national dialogue" — boycotted as a sham by much of the opposition — aimed at calming soaring political tensions.
Kabila will address the nation Tuesday when he speaks to parliament.
A UN Security Council delegation in the country has called for a peaceful transition of power following the government's decision to delay elections.

Sunday, 13 November 2016

Good financial moves you can make in Just 5 minutes or more



Hey, can you spare a few minutes? We know you’re busy, but chances are you can set aside 30 minutes to tackle some of these quickie tasks. Our collection of financial fixes—designed to save you money, get you on track to reach a goal or simplify your life—run the gamut from trimming your cable or phone bill (15 minutes or less) to applying for a more rewarding rewards card (30 minutes).

Muslim Students set in point over Califonia Targeted Attacks


Authorities at two universities in California said Thursday police were investigating attacks against female Muslim students, one of which was described as a hate crime.
Both attacks came on Wednesday, the day after Donald Trump was elected president at the end of a campaign during which the Republican was criticized for divisive and inflammatory language against Muslims.
In one of the incidents, two assailants confronted their victim at San Diego State University and "made comments about President-elect Trump and the Muslim community," according to campus police.
The woman had her purse, backpack and car keys stolen. She went to get help and returned to the scene with police officers, only to find her car had been stolen, police spokesman Ronald Broussard said.   
The case was being investigated as a suspected hate crime as well as a strong-arm robbery and auto theft, Broussard said.
"Comments made to the student indicate she was targeted because of her Muslim faith, including her wearing of a traditional garment and hijab," university president Elliot Hirshman and interim police chief Josh Mays said in a joint statement.
San Jose State University police said in a statement they were investigating a similar attack against a female student at a campus parking garage.
A male assailant approached the victim from behind, pulling at the victim's head scarf, choking and throwing her off balance, according to the statement circulated to students on Wednesday.
"Campus officials are closely monitoring the situation as the investigation continues. No arrests have been made," university spokeswoman Pat Harris said in an emailed statement to AFP.
"We are, of course, very concerned that this has occurred on our campus. No one should experience this kind of behaviour at San Jose State," she added.
New York University's Muslim Students Association issued a statement on Wednesday saying engineering undergraduates had arrived that morning to find "Trump" scrawled on the door of their prayer room.
The organization said members were "realizing that our campus is not immune to the bigotry that grips America."
A Muslim student at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette told police on Wednesday that she was attacked by two men, one of whom was wearing a white hat emblazoned with "Trump."
But local media reported a police statement on Thursday alleging that the girl had made up the attack.
The Lafayette Police Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Doctors releases strike notice, dismiss SRC job evaluation issues




The SRC released a new job structure  for the country’s over 600,000 public servants which seeks to, among other things, bridge the gap between the highest and lowest pay earners.
“SRC has been lying to us for 17 months using the job evaluation thing to delay our CBA and pay increase. Yesterday, they released a report full of nonsense with no figures of what exactly a doctor should earn,” KMPDU Secretary General Ouma Oluga said at the Nairobi Public Service Club.
“We are tired of waiting and are today issuing a 21-day strike notice to start on December 5 if we do not get the agreed 300 per cent pay increase.”
In the pay increase, the highest paid doctor will earn Sh946,000 while the lowest paid will take home Sh342,770.
Currently, the lowest paid doctor earns a basic salary of Sh40,000 that the union Saturday said was too little for their hard work.
“Doctors work 450 hours a month, earning a paltry Sh70 per hour. That is after spending six years in undergraduate, five in Masters education and then on day offs, no holidays and losing a life because of the demands of the job. How then do you pay them Sh70 per hour?” asked KMPDU chair Samwel Oroko.
In Kisumu, the nurses led by the secretary General Seth Panyako said that the SRC, the national and county governments had negated on their promise of a CBA.
Mr Panyako accused SRC chair Sarah Serem of "duplicating job the newly advertised job groups from previous documents".
He said the advertised job groups have been in existence.
"On December 5, services in all public hospitals will be paralysed should the government fail to heed to our demands. The salaries commission has misled the public,” said Mr Panyako during the union's national governing council meeting at the Tom Mboya Labour College in Kisumu on Saturday.
“The CBA we agreed on was never signed, concluded with proper financial allocation made.

Social